Even better spacing
This commit is contained in:
parent
783e6df827
commit
e68e585c61
11
README
11
README
|
@ -53,11 +53,10 @@ Usage:
|
|||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
If you store a reference type like a pointer, slice, map or channel, you do not need to
|
||||
run Set if you modify the underlying data. The cache does not serialize its data, so if
|
||||
you modify a struct whose pointer you've stored in the cache, retrieving that pointer
|
||||
with Get will point you to the same data:
|
||||
|
||||
// If you store a reference type like a pointer, slice, map or channel, you do not need to
|
||||
// run Set if you modify the underlying data. The cache does not serialize its data, so if
|
||||
// you modify a struct whose pointer you've stored in the cache, retrieving that pointer
|
||||
// with Get will point you to the same data:
|
||||
foo := &MyStruct{Num: 1}
|
||||
c.Set("foo", foo, 0)
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +70,7 @@ with Get will point you to the same data:
|
|||
foo := x.(MyStruct)
|
||||
foo.Println(foo.Num)
|
||||
|
||||
will print:
|
||||
// will print:
|
||||
1
|
||||
2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue